In 2026, the pace of new industrial inventory in Mexico could slow down after an exceptionally accelerated period between 2022 and 2024. This moderation does not reflect a pullback in investment, but rather an environment in which the cost of capital, risk tolerance, and pre-leasing requirements are redefining both how—and when—projects are built.

This year, SiiLA estimates the delivery of roughly 225 industrial buildings, totaling more than 4.2 million square meters across the main markets in northern Mexico, the Bajío, and the central region. Even at that level, projected deliveries would be about 29% lower than in 2025, when the industrial real estate market began to show clear signs of adjustment.

The contrast between a still-elevated volume of deliveries and a slower pace reflects the inherent inertia of industrial development. A significant share of the inventory scheduled to enter the market in 2026 corresponds to projects committed well in advance—already financed, under construction, or tied to specific clients—whose investment decisions were made under a different financial backdrop. As a result, the adjustment is visible less in what gets delivered and more in the pace at which new projects are launched, particularly those with a higher speculative component.

That inertia had a visible impact in 2025, when new inventory outpaced net absorption, pushing the vacancy rate higher across several markets. This did not signal a break in demand, but rather a timing mismatch between projects conceived under more expansionary assumptions and a market that, by the time of delivery, was operating with greater financial caution.

The contrast with earlier years is clear. During the peak of nearshoring activity between 2021 and 2022, net absorption consistently exceeded new inventory, and space entered the market largely pre-leased, driven by the urgency to secure capacity in an environment with limited options. Beginning in 2023, as productive relocation became more selective and financial conditions tightened, new inventory began to run ahead of absorption, reducing the share of pre-leases and temporarily lifting vacancy—not due to a lack of demand, but because tenants gained greater ability to wait and negotiate. That adjustment, however, tends to correct as development moves away from the expansive logic of the previous period and realigns with contracts, specific clients, and greater financial discipline.