Twenty kilometers from Monterrey’s urban boundary, in a municipality that until a decade ago was more rural fringe than metropolitan extension, more than twenty Asian companies—including Daye, Fawer, and Hisense—settled in a complex that doesn’t aim to operate as a traditional industrial park, but as an industrial city that is already pushing the urban footprint outward.

In 2017, Hofusan began rising in Salinas Victoria as an 8.5 sqKm project—twice the size of Polanco or Central Park—where just over half of the land was reserved for manufacturing and the rest for offices, services, retail, entertainment, and housing. Today, it comprises more than 500,000 sqm of operational industrial space, an industrial pipeline of nearly 150,000 sqm, and 47,000 sqm of residential space under construction, including seven buildings with 1,184 apartments for workers.

The expansion coincides with an accelerated demographic transformation in the area: between 2000 and 2020, the municipality tripled its population density—from 31 to more than 100 inhabitants per hectare—and could exceed 130 by 2030¹. In that context, although the development occupies less than 1% of the municipal territory, its productive scale is no small thing: the developers expect between 15,000 and 18,000 direct jobs in its full deployment, equivalent to between 25% and 35% of the municipality’s estimated workforce capacity.

In Mexico, these transformations are not the exception. Industrial parks and industrial cities emerged as urban policy tools to decentralize productive activity and spark regional development. Since the 1950s, projects that operate as industrial cities—with infrastructure, services, housing, and permanent administration—have demonstrated their ability to reshape the economic geography of entire regions. But they also left a critical lesson: urbanizing industrial land is not enough. Governance, long-term planning, and public or institutional investment are required because their economic and urban effects are slow but structural.

Recent evidence confirms it. A study in the State of Mexico shows that more than 60% of industrial parks are concentrated in metropolitan areas with infrastructure and governance, while peripheral municipalities capture only marginal benefits. And in those urbanized hubs, industrial parks accounted for up to one-third of local employment and between 4% and 8% of state employment. This suggests that territorial impact does not emerge from the park in isolation, but from its ability to amplify the urban structure it plugs into.

Global experience points in the same direction. In Australia, South Korea, and China, industrial parks that evolved into “industrial city” models didn’t just attract manufacturing: they triggered housing, services, tax revenue, mobility, and new patterns of urban occupation. However, the evidence also warns that this process is not neutral: without metrics, governance, and clear rules for urban-industrial integration, these projects can produce the opposite effect—fragmentation, precariousness, and territorial deterioration.

For Mexico, the challenge is no longer merely adding factories; it is building territories capable of turning industry into a city. Projects such as Hofusan, T-MEX Park, or the Isthmus anticipate that shift: industrial parks stop being productive enclaves and evolve into infrastructure that anchors population, pushes boundaries, and activates the services that support daily life. In that horizon, manufacturing is only the starting point, and what matters is not what it produces, but what it leaves behind.

For more analysis, figures, and reports on the evolution of the industrial market, visit SiiLA REsource or write to contacto@siila.com.mx.

***

¹ Urban density figures 2010–2020 are based on official data from the Government of Nuevo León, SEDATU, and SEMARNAT, using INEGI. For 2025 and 2030, densities are estimated using the official urbanized area reported for Salinas Victoria in 2020, calculated from the ratio between municipal population and urban density for that year. Demographic projections are based on the Reconstruction and Population Projection Statistics of Mexican Municipalities. For projected years, the official urbanized area remains constant, in line with the methodology of the 2030 Urban Development Plan and INEGI’s urban density series. Projected density is calculated by dividing the estimated population by that reference area.