Join our mailing list for Real Estate News, Events, Insights & Resources.

Over the past year, more than a thousand brands have taken up space in the leading shopping centers of Mexico City, Guadalajara, Monterrey, and Querétaro. According to SiiLA Market Analytics, a retail company is now three times more likely to choose regional malls, community centers, or lifestyle centers over formats such as outlets, power centers, or super-regional malls.
But that doesn't mean larger or smaller properties are less profitable. Their performance varies by market and depends not on size but on how the space is organized, how consumption flows, and how each center responds to user behavior.
This logic becomes clearer when contrasting two key metrics:
a) Attraction probability, which indicates how many new tenants chose a given mall format relative to the total number that entered the market.
b) Efficiency per property, which reflects how many new brands, on average, were drawn to each center of a given type.
When both indicators align in a single mall format, what emerges is not a passing trend but a structural behavior of the market. However, this alignment between popularity and efficiency does not occur evenly across Mexico's major retail markets.
For example, no single format leads in both metrics at once in Mexico City and Guadalajara. Although 70%-80% of new tenants last year were spread across community centers, lifestyle centers, and regional malls, super-regional malls draw nearly twice as many new brands per property as any other format.
Put another way: imagine we're in the ocean, watching several groups of fish feeding on plankton. One group is a large school of medium and large fish—like community centers, lifestyle centers, and regional malls—where each fish eats a little but collectively consumes a lot. The other group has far fewer fish, but they're massive—like the super-regional malls—and each one eats much more than the smaller fish. So, while the large school eats more in total, the bigger fish capture more on a per-fish basis.
This difference isn't a coincidence nor a mystery—it stems from operational fundamentals.
Super-regional malls concentrate more investment per square meter, operate in strategic locations, and offer a destination experience, with high foot traffic and curated retail mixes designed to attract brands seeking volume, visibility, and positioning. That's why, although there are fewer of them, each one draws more tenants. In contrast, mid-size formats—more numerous and flexible—compete with diverse locations, lower entry costs, and adaptable structures, ideal for brands prioritizing efficiency, proximity, or rapid expansion. It's not about size—it's about purpose. And in the end, each model delivers according to what it promises: some offer scale, others agility. What matters is understanding what each brand seeks—and what each center is equipped to deliver.
This trend is also visible in other regions of the country, though with variations.
Monterrey's attraction pattern follows a similar course to Mexico City and Guadalajara: most new tenants gravitate toward mid-size formats. However, in terms of efficiency, outlets outperform even the super-regional malls. And in Querétaro, the landscape is more concentrated: six out of ten new tenants choose power centers, positioning them as the dominant format in terms of attraction. Still, efficiency again leans toward larger centers—consistent with the national trend.
The fact that these patterns repeat in such different markets is no accident. Activity tends to cluster in specific submarkets within each city—areas where urban development, population density, and a middle class with purchasing power and aspiration come together.
This is the case in places like San Pedro in Monterrey, Zapopan in Guadalajara, Juriquilla in Querétaro, or Santa Fe and Interlomas in Mexico City—areas that host several of the country's top super-regional malls. The large-scale format becomes viable not by its size alone, but because of the surrounding environment: concentrated purchasing power.
By contrast, other zones that are attracting a growing number of brands—despite lacking the scale of super-regional malls—are emerging as new commercial gravity centers. Submarkets like Aragón and Insurgentes in Mexico City, 5 de Febrero and Bernardo Quintana in Querétaro, Apodaca in Monterrey, and Periférico Sur in Guadalajara are capturing growing volumes of tenants thanks to their connection with the everyday flows of urban consumption. These are zones that have grown alongside their cities and compete through density, accessibility, and a middle class seeking proximity, variety, and value.
In many cases, this momentum is also shaped by availability. Mid-size and large formats—currently the most sought-after by new brands—record some of the highest occupancy rates in the market (93–94%), limiting space supply but signaling strong turnover. Others, such as outlets, show a 16% vacancy rate, reflecting lower demand pressure or slower absorption. In this sense, tenant attraction reflects both the preference and supply conditions of each format.
Ultimately, the data reveals that retail in Mexico moves with contextual intelligence. Brands don't choose locations out of habit—but out of strategy. And the success of a shopping center no longer depends on its size, nor even its type, but on its ability to adapt to where it stands.
For more on the development and performance of Mexico's commercial real estate market, visit SiiLA REsource or contact us at contacto@siila.com.mx.











Join our mailing list for Real Estate News, Events, Insights & Resources.
